|

It is time to start seeing through
their Smoke and Mirrors!
For too long, aftermarket
companies have gotten fat off of your money. They overcharge,
then do everything possible to convince you are buying a
"superior" product. They lie. Here are just some of the tactics
they use to convince you to spend too much on an aftermaket torque
converter.
An more importantly, here is why
they are wrong...
|
#1 -
"Our more expensive converter is worth it
because the warranty is
better" |
This one is pretty easy to see through.
Compare the other companies' warranties with ours.
Fuddle Racing's warranty covers
everything including satisfaction. Other comapnies' will
stop coverage if you get the car tuned or even if you throw an SES
code. Those are the facts. Read the warranties.
|
#2 - "Our more expensive converter has a
bigger and better clutch than
others" |
We have never seen a comeptitor's clutch that
is able to beat ours. Simply look below to see who really has the
bigger clutch. Which do you want holding your converter?
Left: A competitor's $1000
"enlarged" clutch
Right: Fuddle Racing's
HP/Street |

Left: A competitor's $1000
"enlarged" clutch
Right: Fuddle Racing's
HP/Race |
|
#3 -
"Our converters use
special technology" |
The idea that one company has access to
technology that no one else uses is ridiculous, yet other comapnies'
still expect you to believe it is true. After all, it comes from the
kings of smoke and mirrors. If there were some special
technology that only one company had access to, all others would
quickly die. There simply isn't. Don't buy into it. You will not
find better torque converters than Fuddle Racing's.
|
#4 -
"Because our converters are more expensive, they are stronger
and will last longer" |
To disprove this, compare features within the
converters. Our converters are built using only the strongest and
most innovative materials. We don't stop with the best clutches and
components; we make sure our build processes, too, bring you
the strongest converters possible.
Click here for detailed info about our
converters.
No one beats Fuddle Racing's quality.
|
#5 -
"Because our converters are more expensive, they are more
efficient" |
When it comes to general converter efficiency,
the single best test is a timeslip. Our converters are proving
themselves where it matters -- AT THE TRACK. With similarly
modified cars, Fuddle Racing is outrunning the
competition.
Always make certain to compare apples to
apples. Some companies will use their larger diameter converters to
tout their efficiency. Larger diameter converters will have better
efficiency but less performance. For example, your stock converter
has good efficiency, but a smaller 245m will outperform a
258mm or larger at the track. You can only compare 245mm to
245mm, or 258mm to 258mm, etc. When you compare apples to
apples, Fuddle Racing will not be beat.
There are companies that will try to convince
you that they have "special" (yes, again "special") parts that
create abnormal efficiency. When you understand converters, you
understand there are no "special" parts. Aside from the
clutch, there are only three main parts inside a converter - a
turbine, a pump(or primary), and a stator. There is nothing exotic
inside a converter, just good parts and building. Fuddle Racing only
uses the best possible parts and combination of parts to build our
converters.
|
#6 -
"We have higher STRs, so we are better"
or
"Our in house testing is the only accurate
testing for STR and Stall
Speed" |
With other companies, you often see
wildly exaggerated ratings of stall and STR. There are actually
ratings released by General Motors that Fuddle Racing uses to rate
its converters. We rate STR lower than many of the inflated
numbers you will see by other companies because General Motors rates
it lower.
Fuddle Racing has had numerous opportunities
to go inside the competition's converters and directly see through
their smoke and mirrors. What we saw was no surprise to us, but it
might be to you. Two examples from two different companies
follow.
- The first was rated at 3200/2.5. When
we opened it and compared their numbers to General Motors'
numbers, the converter actually a 2800/1.8. With a stall speed so
low, it is no wonder it felt relatively tight on the street. It is
also no wonder it did not perform as well as a 3200 should.
- The second, from a large company, was
rated at 3500/2.5. When inside, it turned out to be
a 3200/2.1 when using more accurate General Motors
ratings. The performance would be noticeably different with a
lower stall compared to what the customer wanted and
expected.
Another great misconception and unethical
advertisement that flies around some companies is that big diameter
converters create high STR. A larger diameter converter creates LESS
STR, not more. Perhaps the best example is a 278mm converter.
Advertised at 2.25 STR, this converter won't create anywhere near
that kind of STR.
|
#7 -
"The 21 blade stator" |
Perhaps the biggest exaggerations are 21 blade stator ratings.
The 21 blade stator is most often found in General Motors
minivans. Other companies rate STR very high with
this stator and praise its abilities to create STR. In
reality, according to General Motors, the actual
manufacturer of the stator, it would take building a
4400 stall @ 350 ft lbs for the 21 blade stator to even
get to a solid 2.0 STR! Hardly the numbers these companies
claim.
These companies also claim that it is able to
create superior street feel. This is an easy claim to make, but it
can't be backed up. You will find no significantly
better throttle feel or response from the 21 blade stator
unit than a from a well designed and machined 18 blade
unit.
|
#8 -
"Our personal testing shows that our more expensive converters
are better." |
Meaningless testing on converters is flying
around the internet. While these converter dyno and accelerometer
testing have their place, but it is not for comparing
converters.
- Having access to or an in-house converter
dyno is good for some things. Testing and comparing converter
efficiency certainly isn't one of them, though. The converter dyno
simply does not accurately tell you how a converter will act
in your car. It is operated by an electric motor that will never
recreate real world power for testing. It simply doesn't create
torque like a car does.
- Using accelerometers for testing sounds
great, except that testing must be done off the line in 3rd
gear to get desired numbers. Even then, what you have does
little more than a G-Tech accelerometer, and how would you
rather test -- at the track or with a G-Tech?
Don't be swayed by shadowy, false claims. See
through their smoke and mirrors and find the best converter on the
market -- Fuddle Racing!
|